... Dedicated to the Gandhi Aminatou Haidar Sahara Libre, has tod @ sl @ s death @ s @ s DISAPPEARED silence their voices in the genocide-holocaust of their lives biased. Saharawi people not to fall into oblivion of mediocrity and greed of political dictatorships of the countries of the world where killing is more succulent to give life to those who request it the uncertainty of the nonsense Governmental and political sold their lives and greedy powers that be.
Doramas to put as a post, attached photos and is in several parts, this is the part 1, thanks in advance.
Morocco, a threat to the maintenance of international peace and the so-called "Alliance of Civilizations", that they come back around to all the world powers participate in the slaughter of defenseless countries to those felonies Des- and English Socialist government, doubly complicit by paying a people Sahara, on the greed of a "Dictator Mohamed-VI-World Inquisitor" and wanting to own part a world that does not belong and less, be recognized as a savior democratic and strategic where the blood runs through his hands in reconquest and conquest of Europe and America.
Today, the Western Sahara is one of the most unusual cases of decolonization. A people in arms to defend a power foreign territory it has occupied through the use of force, weapons and annihilation of an entire sovereign people, the Sahara and the Sahrawi.
The legal classification of Morocco in the light of the doctrine of the United Nations as reflected in Resolution 2625-XXV, is that of an Occupying Power, which holds control over a territory that seeks to annex illegally using of force. This situation corresponds to apply the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, ratified by Morocco. And Protocol I of 1977 on the protection of victims of armed conflict. Applicable to people in conflict who struggle against domination colonial, foreign occupation and against racist regimes in the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination. " 
With Resolution 34/37 of 21 November 1979, Morocco, received a double blow, within the OAU and come to recognize: 1
right of self determination for the Saharawi people.
2 The legitimacy of the struggle for political put it into practice.
3 º recognizes the FP as the legitimate representative of the Saharawi people. 4 º Orders
the Moroccan invasion.
How be implemented in a future peace plan?
The future is very uncertain, since the General Secretariat itself has been postponed, first to 1998, later postponed to 2000, 2002 ... and are now in February 2010. The main legal argument to defend the right of self-determination in Western Sahara. is clear that a power such as Morocco, if not using the powers of the First World had ever successfully executed an armed invasion of the territory of Western Sahara and its subsequent occupation. Moroccan dictatorial regime not only stands up to the UN, but denied the evidence. Denies the existence of political prisoners in Moroccan prisons where they are subjected to torture and suffer the worst atrocities in repeated violations of international conventions on human rights and freedom to be themselves. 
The unfortunate reality is that Western powers have had the audacity and even today they do, to provide logistical and financial resources through regional power "occupier", all in violation of the obligation not "supplying arms and technical assistance to the occupying powers, namely Morocco, so they can perpetuate annexation of these territories under the threat thereof.
Obviously, we know that Morocco is in breach of the international order annexing the practice of using force and weapons in the Saharawi territory. Despite the ceasefire. In parallel, the Saharawi people in 2007 has continued to receive support from NGO's and various organizations all over the world. Among these, the proposal of the Norwegian Support to the Saharawi people, established in 1993 and one of the busiest in Europe and the world for the Saharawi cause, "to create an international movement of solidarity with the people Sahrawi movement similar to 'apartheid', which allowed end the racist regime and establish a multiethnic society in South Africa.
Des-position of the English Government, subsequent to the pressures of the parties involved in the conflict, has always been a certain neutrality active, passive and very shameful for our country, having people Norwegian the most moving in the help and support to the Saharawi, while Spain, neighbor and former colony still, just look at their personal and political interest, before effectively help the Saharawi people to Morocco. 
According to international analysts, the Des-Socialist Government of shoes fool, has tried to break the active neutrality historically maintained to support the search for a political settlement between the parties. Always trying to maintain a balance so as not to disturb "excessively" to Morocco, knowing all the drugs out of there and the immigration that comes to our shores without any regard to Spain should not bother "excessive." Nor Algeria, a country of vital importance to Spain economic and energy level.
In principle, the legal assessment of the conduct of states that have supplied arms and continue to provide, and have and are funding the occupation army in the Saharan territory, beginning and ending with the U.S. De-English Government, involves that these states are complicit by default and coauthors per share, consisting of an internationally wrongful act in breach of the principle prohibiting the use of force and the principle of self-determination, as currently foreseen in art. 27 on international responsibility of States adopted by the International Law Commission in 1996.
The principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources in the Sahara, could lead to the establishment of international mechanisms for the Saharawi people to seek compensation and satisfaction for all States for over 35 years have been stealing those natural resources by illegal armed occupation of the Saharawi territory by Morocco. We can say that under no circumstances may a people be deprived of their livelihoods and sustenance, so down the art. 1.2 of the 1966 Covenants conventional rule which states submit signed as Spain, Morocco and Australia.
Continued on next installment 
My thoughts: - " affect me any threat against all human and humans against families, welfare and nations. Threatened and endangered always have their origin in the weakness and greed of ill-political, ill-Governors. In the superficial and irrational way of considering human life, human lives, biased and skewed by opportunistic dictators. " Sincerely
harimaguada
